Free Markets, Fiscal Responsibility, Smaller Government, Secure Borders
Letter to the Editor:
I read the recent ‘SV Herald View’ with regards to County water regulations.
Let me provide a different perspective.
The concern voiced is for the San Pedro River. If the goal of water conservation is the preservation of the river, then let’s look at some facts and use those to drive our actions.
The cottonwoods are not native trees. They were not here 100 years ago. Consider thinning the trees. Each mature cottonwood uses approximately 100 gallons AN HOUR during the summer. That equates to approximately 72 million gallons of water for 10,000 trees during three months of the summer. Thinning the trees would provide better habitat for the ungulate species, while retaining habitat for migratory birds and saving water.
Consider removing the non-native mesquite; which provide “clearings for wildlife habitat”.
Conservation should be a priority for everyone, a personal choice. Instituting regulations that cannot be enforced on existing homes seems counter-productive. They ‘sound good’ but accomplish nothing.
Educate the public. That way you have voluntary buy in; and voluntary compliance. Utilize Upper San Pedro Partnership and the Cochise Water Project to distribute information to new home owners; existing owners; and new residents purchasing existing homes, about the removal of invasive plants like desert broom and mesquite.
Perhaps the rural community is provincial…and perhaps that is why we live in the county. We are responsible for ourselves; look out for each other; and actually do conserve water because we are on private wells and understand its importance.
Level II publication